aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc')
-rw-r--r--gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc2040
1 files changed, 1020 insertions, 1020 deletions
diff --git a/gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc b/gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
index 3f5ed65..13dbec4 100644
--- a/gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
+++ b/gtest-1.6.0/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
@@ -1,1020 +1,1020 @@
-// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
-// All rights reserved.
-//
-// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
-// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
-// met:
-//
-// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
-// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
-// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
-// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
-// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
-// distribution.
-// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
-// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
-// this software without specific prior written permission.
-//
-// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
-// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
-// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
-// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
-// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
-// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
-// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
-// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
-// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
-//
-// A unit test for Google Test itself. This verifies that the basic
-// constructs of Google Test work.
-//
-// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
-
-#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
-#include "gtest/gtest.h"
-
-// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
-// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
-// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to
-// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
-// his code.
-#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
-#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
-#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
-
-#include <stdlib.h>
-
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
-using testing::TestPartResultArray;
-
-using testing::internal::Notification;
-using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
-#endif
-
-namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
-using testing::internal::String;
-using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
-
-// Tests catching fatal failures.
-
-// A subroutine used by the following test.
-void TestEq1(int x) {
- ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
-}
-
-// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
-// generates, and then returns early.
-void TryTestSubroutine() {
- // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
- TestEq1(2);
-
- // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
- //
- // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
- // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
- if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
-
- // If we get here, something is wrong.
- FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
-}
-
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
-}
-
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
-}
-
-// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
-// failing test summary.
-class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
-
-TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
-}
-
-// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
-// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
- FailingParamTest,
- testing::Values(2));
-
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
- printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
-
- TryTestSubroutine();
-}
-
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
- printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
-
- // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
- TryTestSubroutine();
-
- // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
- //
- // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
- // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
- if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
-
- // If we get here, something is wrong.
- FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
-}
-
-// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
- printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
- EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure
- ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed.
-}
-
-// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
-TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
- static const int a[4] = {
- 3, 9, 2, 6
- };
-
- printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
- for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
- printf("i == %d\n", i);
- EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
- }
-}
-
-// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
-
-// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
-void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
- ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
-}
-
-// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
-void SubWithTrace(int n) {
- SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
-
- SubWithoutTrace(n);
-}
-
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
- printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-
- // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
-
- {
- SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
- // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
- // the trace.
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
- }
-
- // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
- // should be no trace again.
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
-}
-
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
- printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-
- for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
- SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
-
- SubWithoutTrace(i);
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
- printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-
- SubWithTrace(1);
- SubWithTrace(2);
-}
-
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
- printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-
- SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message.
-
- SubWithTrace(2);
-}
-
-// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
- printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-
- SCOPED_TRACE("A");
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
-
- SCOPED_TRACE("B");
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
-
- {
- SCOPED_TRACE("C");
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
- << "trace point A, B, and C.";
- }
-
- SCOPED_TRACE("D");
- ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
- << "trace point A, B, and D.";
-}
-
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
-// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by
-// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
-
-// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
-//
-// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned)
-// ===============================|================================
-// spawns thread B |
-// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
-// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
-// | generates failure #1
-// | notifies n1
-// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
-// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2
-// generates failure #2 |
-// notifies n2 |
-// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-// waits for n3 | generates failure #3
-// | trace B dies
-// | generates failure #4
-// | notifies n3
-// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-// generates failure #5 | finishes
-// trace A dies |
-// generates failure #6 |
-// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-// waits for thread B to finish |
-
-struct CheckPoints {
- Notification n1;
- Notification n2;
- Notification n3;
-};
-
-static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
- {
- SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
- check_points->n1.Notify();
- check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
-
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
- } // Trace B dies here.
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
- check_points->n3.Notify();
-}
-
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
- printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
-
- CheckPoints check_points;
- ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
- &check_points,
- NULL);
- check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
-
- {
- SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
- check_points.n2.Notify();
- check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
-
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
- } // Trace A dies here.
- ADD_FAILURE()
- << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
- thread.Join();
-}
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-
-TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
- DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
- // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for
- // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
- // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
- // the test output.
-}
-
-// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
-//
-// This function creates two failures intentionally.
-void AdHocTest() {
- printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
- EXPECT_TRUE(false);
- EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
-}
-
-// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
-int RunAllTests() {
- AdHocTest();
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
-}
-
-// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
-class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
- NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
- printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
- }
-
- ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
- }
-
- virtual void SetUp() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
-}
-
-// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
-class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
- FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
- Init();
- }
-
- ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
- }
-
- virtual void SetUp() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). "
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
- << "had a fatal failure.";
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). "
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
- << "had a fatal failure.";
- }
- private:
- void Init() {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. "
- << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
- << "had a fatal failure.";
-}
-
-// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
-class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
- virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
- Deinit();
- }
-
- virtual void SetUp() {
- printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
- }
- private:
- void Deinit() {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
-}
-
-// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
-class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
- virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
- Deinit();
- }
-
- virtual void SetUp() {
- printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
- }
- private:
- void Deinit() {
- FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
- FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. "
- << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
-}
-
-TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
- ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
-}
-
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-
-// A unary function that may die.
-void DieIf(bool should_die) {
- GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
-}
-
-// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
-
-// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
-struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
- SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
-
- Notification spawn_thread_started;
- Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
-
- private:
- GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
-};
-
-// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
-// MultipleThreads test (below).
-static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
- // Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
- notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
-
- // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
- notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
-}
-
-// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
-// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later
-// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
-class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
- // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
- virtual void SetUp() {
- thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
- &ThreadRoutine, &notifications_, NULL));
- notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
- }
- // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
- // Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
- // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
- // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class
- // cleans up after itself as best it can.
- virtual void TearDown() {
- notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
- }
-
- private:
- SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
- scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_;
-};
-
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-
-// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
-// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
-// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture
-// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
-
-// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
-// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
-// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
-// fail.
-
-namespace foo {
-
-class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
-
-class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
- TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
-
-} // namespace foo
-
-namespace bar {
-
-class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the
-// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
-
-class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
- TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
-
-} // namespace bar
-
-// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
-// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first
-// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
-// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
-
-class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
-
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
-
-class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
-
-// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
-}
-
-// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
-int global_integer = 0;
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
- global_integer = 0;
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
-// (static or not).
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
- int m = 0;
- static int n;
- n = 1;
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
-// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
-// non-fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- }, "");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
-// non-fatal failures.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
- }, "");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
- }, "");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested returns.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- return;
- }, "");
-}
-
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested throws.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- try {
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
- throw 0;
- }, "");
- } catch(int) { // NOLINT
- }
-}
-
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
- global_integer = 0;
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
-// variables.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
- static int n;
- n = 1;
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
-// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
- }, "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- }, "");
-}
-
-// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
-void FatalFailure() {
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
-// fatal failures.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- FatalFailure();
- FatalFailure();
- }, "");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }, "");
-}
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested returns.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- return;
- }, "");
-}
-
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested throws.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
- printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
- try {
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
- throw 0;
- }, "");
- } catch(int) { // NOLINT
- }
-}
-
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-
-// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
-#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
-
-template <typename T>
-class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
-
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
- EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
-}
-
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
- EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
-}
-
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
-
-// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
-#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
-
-template <typename T>
-class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
-
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
- EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
-}
-
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
- EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
-}
-
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
-
-typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
-
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
-
-#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
-// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-
-TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
-}
-
-# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
-
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
-// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-
-template <typename T>
-class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
-TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
-
-TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
-}
-
-# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
-
-# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
-
-
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
-// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-
-template <typename T>
-class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
-};
-
-TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
-
-TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
-}
-
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
-
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
-
-# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
-
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-
-// Tests various failure conditions of
-// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
-class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
- public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
- enum FailureMode {
- FATAL_FAILURE,
- NONFATAL_FAILURE
- };
- static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
- if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
- } else {
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
- // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
- // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
- "failure.");
- // Wrong message.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
- "expected.");
-}
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
- // Wrong message.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
- "failure.");
-}
-
-#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-
-class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
- protected:
- static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
- ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
- thread.Join();
- }
-};
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
- // We only intercept the current thread.
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
- "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
- // We only intercept the current thread.
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
- "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-
-typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
-
-// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
-// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
-TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
- printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
- TestPartResultArray results;
- {
- ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
- ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
- &results);
- AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
- AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
- }
- // The two failures should not have been intercepted.
- EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
-}
-
-#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
- // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
- // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
- "Expected non-fatal failure.");
- // Wrong message.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
- "Some other fatal failure expected.");
-}
-
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
- "failure.");
- // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
- "Expected fatal failure.");
- // Wrong message.
- printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
- EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
- "Some other non-fatal failure.");
-}
-
-
-// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
-
-class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
- public:
- virtual void SetUp() {
- printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
- FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
- }
-};
-
-class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
- public:
- virtual void SetUp() {
- printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
- }
-
- virtual void TearDown() {
- printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
- ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
- }
-};
-
-bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false;
-
-// The main function.
-//
-// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
-// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
-// with the "golden" file.
-int main(int argc, char **argv) {
- testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
-
- // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
- // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
- // this program with the golden file.
-
- // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
- // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test
- // for it.
- testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
- if (argc >= 2 &&
- String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")
- GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
-
-#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
- if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
- // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
- // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
-# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
- posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
-# else
- posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
-# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
- }
-#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-
- if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
- return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
-
- // Registers two global test environments.
- // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
- // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
- testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
- testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
-
- return RunAllTests();
-}
+// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// A unit test for Google Test itself. This verifies that the basic
+// constructs of Google Test work.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
+// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
+// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to
+// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
+// his code.
+#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
+#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
+#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
+using testing::TestPartResultArray;
+
+using testing::internal::Notification;
+using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
+#endif
+
+namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
+using testing::internal::String;
+using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
+
+// Tests catching fatal failures.
+
+// A subroutine used by the following test.
+void TestEq1(int x) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
+}
+
+// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
+// generates, and then returns early.
+void TryTestSubroutine() {
+ // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+ TestEq1(2);
+
+ // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+ //
+ // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
+ // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
+ if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
+
+ // If we get here, something is wrong.
+ FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+
+TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
+}
+
+TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
+}
+
+// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
+// failing test summary.
+class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
+
+TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
+}
+
+// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
+// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
+ FailingParamTest,
+ testing::Values(2));
+
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+
+ TryTestSubroutine();
+}
+
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+
+ // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+ TryTestSubroutine();
+
+ // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+ //
+ // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
+ // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
+ if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
+
+ // If we get here, something is wrong.
+ FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+
+// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure
+ ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed.
+}
+
+// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
+TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
+ static const int a[4] = {
+ 3, 9, 2, 6
+ };
+
+ printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
+ for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
+ printf("i == %d\n", i);
+ EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
+ }
+}
+
+// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
+
+// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+
+// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithTrace(int n) {
+ SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
+
+ SubWithoutTrace(n);
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
+ printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+ // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+
+ {
+ SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
+ // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
+ // the trace.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
+ }
+
+ // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
+ // should be no trace again.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
+ printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+ for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
+ SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
+
+ SubWithoutTrace(i);
+ }
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
+ printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+ SubWithTrace(1);
+ SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
+ printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+ SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message.
+
+ SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
+ printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+ SCOPED_TRACE("A");
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
+
+ SCOPED_TRACE("B");
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
+
+ {
+ SCOPED_TRACE("C");
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
+ << "trace point A, B, and C.";
+ }
+
+ SCOPED_TRACE("D");
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
+ << "trace point A, B, and D.";
+}
+
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
+// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by
+// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
+
+// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
+//
+// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned)
+// ===============================|================================
+// spawns thread B |
+// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
+// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
+// | generates failure #1
+// | notifies n1
+// -------------------------------+--------------------------------
+// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2
+// generates failure #2 |
+// notifies n2 |
+// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+// waits for n3 | generates failure #3
+// | trace B dies
+// | generates failure #4
+// | notifies n3
+// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+// generates failure #5 | finishes
+// trace A dies |
+// generates failure #6 |
+// -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+// waits for thread B to finish |
+
+struct CheckPoints {
+ Notification n1;
+ Notification n2;
+ Notification n3;
+};
+
+static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
+ {
+ SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
+ check_points->n1.Notify();
+ check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
+
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
+ } // Trace B dies here.
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
+ check_points->n3.Notify();
+}
+
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
+ printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
+
+ CheckPoints check_points;
+ ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
+ &check_points,
+ NULL);
+ check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
+
+ {
+ SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
+ check_points.n2.Notify();
+ check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
+
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
+ } // Trace A dies here.
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
+ thread.Join();
+}
+#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+
+TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
+ DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
+ // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for
+ // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
+ // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
+ // the test output.
+}
+
+// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
+//
+// This function creates two failures intentionally.
+void AdHocTest() {
+ printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(false);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
+}
+
+// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
+int RunAllTests() {
+ AdHocTest();
+ return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
+
+// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+ }
+
+ ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+ }
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
+}
+
+// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+ Init();
+ }
+
+ ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+ }
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). "
+ << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+ << "had a fatal failure.";
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). "
+ << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+ << "had a fatal failure.";
+ }
+ private:
+ void Init() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. "
+ << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+ << "had a fatal failure.";
+}
+
+// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
+class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+ Deinit();
+ }
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
+ }
+ private:
+ void Deinit() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
+}
+
+// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
+class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+ Deinit();
+ }
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
+ }
+ private:
+ void Deinit() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+ FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. "
+ << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
+}
+
+TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
+ ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
+}
+
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+
+// A unary function that may die.
+void DieIf(bool should_die) {
+ GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
+}
+
+// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
+
+// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
+struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
+ SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
+
+ Notification spawn_thread_started;
+ Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
+
+ private:
+ GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
+};
+
+// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
+// MultipleThreads test (below).
+static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
+ // Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
+ notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
+
+ // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
+ notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
+}
+
+// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
+// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later
+// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
+class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
+ &ThreadRoutine, &notifications_, NULL));
+ notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
+ }
+ // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
+ // Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
+ // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
+ // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class
+ // cleans up after itself as best it can.
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
+ }
+
+ private:
+ SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
+ scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_;
+};
+
+#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+
+// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
+// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
+// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture
+// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
+
+// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
+// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
+// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
+// fail.
+
+namespace foo {
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+ TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+
+} // namespace foo
+
+namespace bar {
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the
+// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+ TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+
+} // namespace bar
+
+// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
+// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first
+// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
+// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
+
+class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
+
+// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
+
+class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
+
+// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
+}
+
+// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
+int global_integer = 0;
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+ global_integer = 0;
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
+// (static or not).
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
+ int m = 0;
+ static int n;
+ n = 1;
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
+// non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// non-fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ return;
+ }, "");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ try {
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ throw 0;
+ }, "");
+ } catch(int) { // NOLINT
+ }
+}
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+ global_integer = 0;
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
+// variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
+ static int n;
+ n = 1;
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
+void FatalFailure() {
+ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ FatalFailure();
+ FatalFailure();
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ return;
+ }, "");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+ printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+ try {
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ throw 0;
+ }, "");
+ } catch(int) { // NOLINT
+ }
+}
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
+#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+
+template <typename T>
+class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
+
+TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
+}
+
+TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
+}
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+
+// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
+#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+
+template <typename T>
+class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
+}
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
+}
+
+REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
+
+typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
+INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
+// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+
+TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+
+# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
+// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+
+template <typename T>
+class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
+TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
+
+TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+
+# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+
+# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+
+
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
+// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+
+template <typename T>
+class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
+
+TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+
+REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
+
+INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
+
+# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+// Tests various failure conditions of
+// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
+class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
+ public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
+ enum FailureMode {
+ FATAL_FAILURE,
+ NONFATAL_FAILURE
+ };
+ static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
+ if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
+ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ } else {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
+ // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
+ // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
+ "failure.");
+ // Wrong message.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
+ "expected.");
+}
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
+ // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+ // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
+ // Wrong message.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
+ "failure.");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+
+class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
+ protected:
+ static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
+ ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
+ thread.Join();
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
+ // We only intercept the current thread.
+ printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
+ // We only intercept the current thread.
+ printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
+
+// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
+// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
+TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
+ printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+ TestPartResultArray results;
+ {
+ ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
+ ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
+ &results);
+ AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
+ AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
+ }
+ // The two failures should not have been intercepted.
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
+}
+
+#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
+ // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
+ // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+ // Wrong message.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Some other fatal failure expected.");
+}
+
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
+ // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
+ "failure.");
+ // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Expected fatal failure.");
+ // Wrong message.
+ printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+ EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+ "Some other non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+
+// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
+
+class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+ public:
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+ }
+};
+
+class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+ public:
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+ }
+};
+
+bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false;
+
+// The main function.
+//
+// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
+// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
+// with the "golden" file.
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+ testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
+
+ // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
+ // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
+ // this program with the golden file.
+
+ // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
+ // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test
+ // for it.
+ testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+ if (argc >= 2 &&
+ String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")
+ GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+ if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
+ // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
+ // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
+# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+ posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
+# else
+ posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
+# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+ return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+ }
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+ if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
+ return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+
+ // Registers two global test environments.
+ // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
+ // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
+ testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
+ testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
+
+ return RunAllTests();
+}
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-04-17 02:14:21 +0000