Optimize decoding tree to save more memory
#2
Open
opened 4 years ago by tcsullivan
·
1 comments
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(<nil>)'
Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?
See here.
Most importantly, we need to allow for larger decoding trees. Secondly though (and maybe this should be a separate issue), the decoding tree could likely be refined/redesigned to either take up less memory or work more efficiently.
Forgot that the input data gets left uncompressed if compression doesn't save space. The bug was simply in
decoder::end
returning a byte beyond what it should have for the uncompressed scenario. I'll commit the fix for the bug, but will still leave this issue up for the possibility of enhancing the decoder tree.